Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamyn Damazer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete Ironholds (talk) 00:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Benjamyn Damazer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable bureaucrat whose single claim to fame is that--seven years ago--he worked in a low-level job in Baghdad's Green Zone. Obviously, that's not enough to satisfy WP:N in terms of WP:BIO. The article also has WP:COI problems, and quite possibly WP:AUTO, with extensive editing by a user with the same name as the editor's subject. Very recently, when the article was prodded, this WP:COI user removed the prod himself. Despite years of careful tending by the WP:SPA, the article does not contain a single reference that satisfies WP:RS Qworty (talk) 23:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Found one RS on him, inserted it and the material it supports, and removed all the unsourced material. Not much left I'm afraid. EEng (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - The only source is part of a slice of life in the Green Zone series. "Benjamyn Damazer" is interchangeable with any other person in terms of importance for the BBC piece and so it really doesn't help to establish notability.  There was also a claim to being the author of a book which can be verified be checking for it on the LuLu site.  As a self-published book, it unsurprisingly has no coverage in reliable sources either so his work as an author does not make him notable either. -- Whpq (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.