Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bennie Brownlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Bennie Brownlow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I don't know if he is particularly notable or not. He did manage in the minors for a while and he has a league championship. You decide. Alex (talk) 06:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't the minor leagues still count as fully professional, per WP:ATH? Silver  seren C 06:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment According to some yes, according to some, no. Alex (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Bit of an odd one, this is. While I would not give blanket notability to minor league anything, this particular individual shows a distinguished amount of time in the minor leagues, some 20+ years it looks like (correct me if I'm wrong).  Due to the time of prominice (1910-1930 or so), it is highly unlikely that any of the research available will be online anytime soon--most will be in hardcopy books back in the "stacks" somewhere.  I say keep this one for historical value and let the article grow.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.