Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Buggles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Benny Buggles

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-Notable book. Unable to find substantial references in Google to support Notability ttonyb1 (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. Article created by User:Willjust.  The book's author is William Just.  The publisher is WJ Publishing.  And the printer is Lulu (search on Lulu for it as lulu is on the URL blacklist so I cannot post it here).  I searched for reviews of the book in reliable sources, and found none. -- Whpq (talk) 22:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as COI/spam. A book written by a redlinked author published by a redlinked publisher alone suggests non-notability. – sgeureka t•c 11:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

*Keep Recently published. Let it have a chance.Bildstit (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Striking out !vote of a sockpuppet of a banned editor. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete concur with above. JJL (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * A press release isn't a good argument for keeping this article -- Whpq (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —94.196.163.252 (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant advert due to the lack of reliable sources. Since it was released literally days ago and is by a non-famous author, such sources are unlikely to surface in the future too. It's a shame that promotional attempts like this get sites blacklisted. I know at least three notable Lulu authors two of which already have a longstanding uncontested article. - Mgm|(talk) 13:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete wikipedia is not advertising, and that's all this is.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.