Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bent Creek Winery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie ☆ S93  01:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Bent Creek Winery

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable BodegasAmbite (talk) 08:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * comment: user:Dante Alighieri previously restored the article from an expired prod stating it was notable. -- w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 09:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Is that ethical for an admin to do? Restore a page that they created after it was deleted via prod by another admin? AgneCheese/Wine 16:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice. All the news sources Google has on this consumer business seem to be local (Tri Valley Herald, Contra Costa Times). If their products ever are reviewed by wine magazines or so forth, that would put them on the map. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – Just not enough coverage at this point to establish notability. However, I am going to go out and try a bottle.  Good Luck to the owner. ShoesssS Talk 14:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As a member of the WP:WINE project I see no non-trivial coverage of this winery that establishes any kind of concrete of notability for an encyclopedia article instead of a WP:WINEGUIDE. All there appears to be are sources are the same type of isolated local features that your local pizza shop or deli could achieve. We wouldn't have a Wikipedia article on Joe's Pizza per WP:CORP passed on the same type of coverage and there is no reason why a winery should be any different. AgneCheese/Wine 16:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, although with better 3rd-party coverage and awards in some meaningful competitions (beyond local/regional popularity contests), I could be convinced to keep the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.