Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentley & Skinner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Speedy keep, references added and notability proven. (non-admin closure) ~DC  Talk To Me 23:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Bentley & Skinner
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non notable jewelers Wuh  Wuz  Dat  18:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Let's see, we have a company started in 1880, jeweler to the royal family, and the first three gnews hits are significant pieces in Reuters, the Daily Mail and the Independent . Add to that 21 hits in gbooks. Where exactly is notability not satisfied? (Full disclosure -- I already declined a spam speedy the nom placed on the article one minute after creation)-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep but the material above needs to be added.    DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per verified notability now shown in article. Its a sad fact that stubs like this will be nominated from time to time, but I guess that does get them improved.--Milowent (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above. Clearly notable. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - completely non-borderline. — James Kalmar   22:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.