Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentley Jones (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Bentley Jones
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Sizeable amounts of unverified, unoriginal sourcing. Also of dubious notability. Shawn Is Here : Now in colors 02:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Shawn Is Here : Now in colors 02:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow. Almost all of his 52(!) references are to his own blog. The "EMI album deal" he refers to is referenced from his blog as well. I suspect there would be a statement from EMI directly if he had been signed to anything. Subject appears possibly to be notable, but it is difficult to tell if it is legitimate due to mostly original sourcing. Needs independent verifiable sources to keep. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares


 * Delete Google doesn't show that this subject is notable at all. Netalarm   poke  04:20, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a vanity page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaqphule (talk • contribs) 18:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.