Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentley miniature railway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Fails to meet primary notability criterion nor any sub-criteria, as cited by the nominator.  Daniel  10:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Bentley miniature railway

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Nv8200p talk 02:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep it--despite the lack of outside sources, it seems to be significant and unusual — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.2.86 (talk • contribs)


 * Delete, page itself doesn't assert notability. --Sigma 7 03:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per nom. Chances are it's actually notable or at least quaint, but there aren't any non first-party sources so it's a non-runner. Stifle (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * For what it is worth, a quick Google discloses a number of non-first-party sites referring to it.  The simple test would be for someone to find out whether it has any notability as a local tourist attraction, but I'm not in a position to -- SockpuppetSamuelson 11:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; this is a notable attraction that is part of the Bentley Wildfowl and Motor Museum which is a tourist spot; it was run by the council for a number of years, and it was the host of English Wine and Regional Food Festival for a number of years. John Vandenberg 14:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.