Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benz Patent dilemma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Benz Patent dilemma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A cursory Google search doesn't pull up anything relevant. Can find no evidence of notability or even verifiability. Article is unsourced. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A story told by a youtube commentator is not article-worthy. jps (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, unsourced neologism. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.