Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benzion Klatzko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sir Joseph (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Benzion Klatzko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is notable only for shabbat.com and affiliated sites, which has an article. Otherwise the article is filled with unsourced and extremely dubious claims. Sir Joseph (talk) 04:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph (talk)  04:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Contrary to the claim of the nominator, he is also know for the Akiva Trip and his campus outreach work, and both are also sourced. He also received some awards, which is also sourced. Finally, I fail to see what claims are "extremely dubious" in the nominator's eyes. I see no grand claims that seem "extremely dubious" here. Debresser (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Credible claims of notability backed by reliable and verifiable sources. Any material considered "unsourced" or "dubious" should be corrected or tagged; this isn't justification for deletion. Alansohn (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep because it is easy to find and add sources like this: .E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That source does not mention anything about being the largest Jewish social networking site. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it was meant merely to support notability. I removed the sketchy claim.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Cleared out unsourced claims, removed PROMO, sourced.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.