Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beppi's restaurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Beppi's restaurant
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable restaurant. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonnotable. Themfromspace (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep This might actually be worth improving. This article calls it "a Sydney institution", and there are several mentions in non-Australian sources, like the New York Times (second hit at Google News). Beppi Polese is listed in 1001 Australians You Should Know, whatever that is. Zagalejo^^^ 04:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * As the creator of the article was User:Marc Polese (and shares a last name with the restauranteur), I'm slapping a COI tag on this. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, though there's nothing explicitly promotional in the article as it stands. Zagalejo^^^ 04:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Two page story in Sydney Morning Herald. I fixed the links for the sources. Fifty year old restaurant. "Patrons are known to have been disgusted by tardy service and indifference by the apathetic staff," was not a rave review. But This place is notable per substantial coverage. Also, there's a notable book about Beppi. This is definitely a keep. Needs to be expanded.ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Place was the subject of multiple notable publications satisfying WP:GNG. COI is not a reason to delete. - Mgm|(talk) 09:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be non-notable. If every diner that got a review in a paper was notable this Project would get overwhelmed --50 years or not. New York City alone would cause a deluge.  None of those sources prove otherwise, including the book review of a book that the owner self-authored.  It might be a good book, but it does nothing to demonstrate why the restaurant is any more notable.  If this is kept, can I list the local sandwich place I go to for lunch?  It has more reviews than this place and I like it.  --Bobak (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If your local sandwich shop gets a two page write up in a large newspaper, has a book about the owner's history, and has other substantial media coverage, yes. :) I'm partial to prosciutto and roasted red pepper Italian sandwiches. What's the place got? ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Strongly mentioned in a biography "Beppi: A Life in Three Courses", over a dozen other mentions in books that may be useful and a sufficiency of news articles. Seems to be ample to write a well-reference, neutral and readable article...which is all that the guidelines seek to achieve - Peripitus (Talk) 07:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.