Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berf art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as either vandalism or an advert for a company that would require practically a complete overhaul in order to make an article. Given that the creator of the article,, has given us such silliness as Berf and Everett Lobster, both of which were silly vandalism, it is highly probable that a one-sentence article on a company with no supporting citations and only a borough name to go on for context is simply more of the same. I strongly suspect, given prior deleted edits (which I won't provide specifics of because they are personally identifying), that the author has just invented this company, and even if it were real this would be self-promotion. Uncle G 15:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Berf art
Is it advertsing or vanity? Also does not meet WP:CORP or WP:V -Nv8200p talk 14:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per new criteria G11, also has a huge image that should go too. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 14:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Extreme delete including image so awful it made me... berf. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as an obvious advertisement without even the slightest claim of notability. AdamBiswanger1 15:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.