Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bericap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Bericap

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Recent additions have been copy vios from the company's own web site - probable COI editing. Searches reveal the usual clutch of directory listing, social media etc but nothing of any substance or reliability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 10:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:CORPSPAM stub. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: The best source appears to be a one-paragraph case study on eastern European plant expansions here. Clearly a company going about its business, with various routine announcements, but I am not seeing evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.