Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beringer Capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I find McMatter's comments the most persuasive. Daniel (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Beringer Capital

 * – ( View AfD View log )

insufficient 3rd party substantial sourcing for WP:NCORP. Pitchbook is just a directory, giving directory information only.  DGG ( talk ) 18:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - My search only found brief mentions or general announcements. Nothing satisfying WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I switched out the Pitchbook source for a Bloomberg source; additional sourcing from the Globe and Mail was added. This is a satisfactory stub that meets WP:GNG needs and could easily be expanded if people wanted to. Capt. Milokan (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep WP:GNG There's nothing wrong with the sourcing in the article and I just added two more sources that further covered this private equity firm's activities over the past few years. I would be more impressed if people took the effort to expand a stub rather than try to delete it 17 minutes after it was added to this website. And Adoil Descended (talk) 09:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete We purposely have a more stringent criteria for the sources used to establish notability of organizations and corporations at WP:NCORP. That is above and beyond the standard of WP:GNG. WP:ORGCRIT requires in depth coverage about the company itself not their routine business transactions. Most of the references provided are that of standard announcements and transactions none provide any real detail on the corporation or their history which fails the WP:ORGDEPTH test as they all represent trivial coverage. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:NCORP. Mommmyy (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Deleteas per nom and others. Clearly fails to meet WP:NCORP. -Hatchens (talk) 06:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.