Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berita (TV program)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Berita (TV program)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability. None of the references in the article address the subject, or are promotional material, so there is no SIGCOV. References themselves are not IS RS for notability. BEFORE showed promotional material, database listings.  // Timothy :: talk  00:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to consider the suggestion, I believe, of a Merge with a TV station or network as an ATD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Television,  and Indonesia. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 03:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The nominator has encapsulated the reasons for deletion perfectly. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - another article by this editor who has recently created a spate of articles about non-notable subjects. Fails WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 00:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Straightforward. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - it is all very well to 'exterminate' such items (as one does with enthusiasm at afds'), the problem is the creating editor has a poor grasp of english and was under the impression that programmes are notable as standalones - any sense of fairplay or genuine interest in the background of the editor or the articles would have traced back to the television station to clarify that the programme or its context are in fact adequately covered in the article about the station, if not the material could be merged back... Notability is in a sense a dead point, the issue is whether the actual broadcasting television station article has enough about the programme. JarrahTree 02:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, I don't accept there is any benefit in a merge/rd or that an WP:ATD is necessary or useful. The nomination sums up the rationale to delete. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.