Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bermans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 04:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Bermans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Makes assertion of pioneering in computerised tax collecting, but I could not find siginificant coverage, or indeed any secondary sources to verify them. Appears to fail WP:CORP. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 14:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep -- The company's website suggests that the content of the article is accurate. They appear to be a specialist firm operating mainly in a narrow field of finance.  My question is one of how significant they are, and I have no answer to that.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Good deal of secondary sources found easily when search is narrowed with search terms including: "Bermans"; Liverpool; law. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.