Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bermuda Smash Invitational


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Bermuda Smash Invitational

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable cricket tournament which fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC, and WP:EVENT. AA (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. AA (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, United Kingdom,  and Caribbean.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is what looks to be WP:GNG on the tournament in media, although a lot of it from Bermudian related sources. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I don't know what Rugbyfan found to consider a "keep" vote. The highest to SIGCOV I can found is this. Other sources found in the article and google news are just about WP:ROUTINE announcements like- Bermuda Smash to feature 4 teams/Bermuda Cricket to host inaugural edition bla bla blah According to me, it is nowhere near to pass WP:GNG. As AA mentioned, it's an unofficial minor league, so no reason to keep it. RoboCric Let's chat  12:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Robocric's assessment. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.