Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bermudadreieck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy close No reason to delete given. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Bermudadreieck

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

See disk page of article DaSch (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you have an actual reason to delete this? Bearcat (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Close Close and take it to pages that needs translation and the Cleanup part The Rolling Camel (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "short stub, less information, orphan, misstranslation from de.wp" --DaSch (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * there is nobody who would take care of this article and I do not want to. --DaSch (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * None of those is a reason to delete the article, if it's a place that really exists. If the place doesn't exist at all, that would be a reason to delete; if the article can't be improved, that might be a reason to redirect it somewhere else; if the information is inaccurate that's a reason to list it for cleanup. But Wikipedia doesn't delete things just because they're stubs. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.