Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Lewis bibliography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If formatting is at odds with MOS, that is an editing fix. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Bernard Lewis bibliography

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Formatting completely at odds with MOS; should be merged into Bernard Lewis, keeping the formatting therein. — Guarapiranga ☎ 05:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * No objection on my part. N ataev  talk 05:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Bibliographies,  and History. — Guarapiranga ☎ 05:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge. Agree with nominator. CT55555 (talk) 05:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are already 33 books in the bibliography, in looking at WorldCat, there appear to be quite a few books that are not yet included. The solution for the formatting being wrong is to fix the formatting.--Jahaza (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep the topic is notable and the content is substantial enough to warrant a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep; merging would take up disproportionate space on the main article. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 15:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Preferably keep if not merge. He was clearly a prolific author.  Sometimes it is appropriate in WP to have such an appendix as a free-standing article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep; For that many books the topic is notable and can have its own article. NMasiha (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.