Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Sarrazain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Bernard Sarrazain

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG, no reliable coverage Pridemanty (talk) 08:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: For analysis of the article's expansion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pridemanty (talk) 08:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The sources in the article consist of two interviews and one summary profile. The latter is the source credited for the great majority of the article and in La Dépêche du Midi, a major news source generally considered RS. One RS and two interviews, however, are not enough to demonstrate compliance with the GNG or any applicable SNG. Looking for further coverage does not disclose any other sources that would meaningfully change this assessment. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 16:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.