Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernardo Cariata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  10:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Bernardo Cariata

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Angola. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep noteable international footballer that played in Primeira Liga (Portugal), Chinese and Angolan first divisions, and in England. Some coverage 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. None of the articles exclusively focus on him, but I think they give reasonable coverage, and there would have been tons more that is not archived anymore.--Ortizesp (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Club website which lacks independence of Cariata. The article also rips off the Dorset Echo source. Source 2 is a blog which are banned from use on BLP's. Source 3 is a namedrop. Source 4 I can't read the full story. Source 5 is another namedrop. Source 6 is routine transfer coverage and source 7 is a mention in a match report. Dougal18 (talk) 10:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Sources above not good enough. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per . Also he definitely has offline sources, as well as Chinese ones, having had an extensive pro and international career in the 1990s and early 2000s. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Another editor above has said that these sources are not of good quality; what's your opinion on this? Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, source analysis by Dougal18 showcases that there is not sufficient coverage for this person to pass GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Dougal's source analysis. Routinely linking non-independent and unreliable sources as evidence of GNG is disruptive. JoelleJay (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only sources giving him more than a trivial mention are non-independent or unreliable websites so clearly this footballer lacks significant coverage in WP:RS Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.