Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernardo Gómez-Pimienta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Bernardo Gómez-Pimienta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The largest part here is the Fellowship but aside from that, I simply found a few several links at Books and News, nothing else solidly convincing. SwisterTwister  talk  06:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Prize-winning architect covered in sources such as the International Architecture Yearbook, Modern Architecture in Latin America and Concise Encyclopedia of Mexico. Andrew D. (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Can you please go to the article and add those references? Thank you. Cheers!  19:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep To find one of Mexico's most accomplished architects here in an AfD is, actually, and at least to me, beyond belief and would like the nominator to explain under what exact WP deletion policy this article was nominated for in the first place as I may be missing something. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 10:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Question Hi In the span of a few hours you've nominated for deletion the articles of two notable artists (Fred Cray and Lindsey White) and one of Mexico's most prominent architects Bernardo Gómez-Pimienta. Granted, all of their articles need work, but is that the reason you're nominating them? Or, are you an expert in this subject seeing things others aren't? Just wondering, and hopefully, willing to learn your evaluation process as it would, most certainly, save me a lot of research time. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable. Johnbod (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – In 2008 the American Institute of Architects only named 13 Honorary Fellows from around the globe, and Gómez-Pimienta was one of them. Cheers!  19:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Note I've started an extensive rewrite of this article and could use some help in: adding portals, adding picture from WP:es (see talk page for link) and putting it into one of those box things, etc. Anyone having additional references they would like in this article, please leave them on the talk page with a message to me and I'll include them if you'd like. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Senseless nomination. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 23:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, senseless to the point of being disruptive. Why do we put up with this sort of thing? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Won many (> 80), some very significant, awards. Mduvekot (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources demonstrate creative notability. Should not have been nominated. —Prhartcom ♥ 13:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.