Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhard Joos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant    talk    21:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Bernhard Joos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This person does not seem to meet the rules on notability Mtking (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Don't see why it should be deleted. A chemist, who invented a medicine and was the founder of a company, is notable enough. He is not well-known (Google proves it), but that doesn't mean he is a petty chemist 'round the corner, who sells medicine or intends to a university. No need to delete in my opinion.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 11:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think that discovery of a new drug, (though others will comment on the signficance of Pyridizal) should be enough for automatic notability but there is more in the Cilag article about Joos. As with others living before the age of the internet the problem is finding the sources, but he may be notable. AJHingston (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As the founder of Cilag (still a big brand 80 years on) he's notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the drugs he discovered, he won a lawsuit in Australia which resulted in a significant change in British Patent Law. I have added the reference to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - per sources in the article and improvements since nomination, meets WP:GNG. &mdash;SW&mdash; comment 19:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.