Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhard Pock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Nancy Kwan. v/r - TP 00:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Bernhard Pock

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Bernhard Pock is the son of a notable actress. He does appear to have been a stunt actor in a large number of films, but being involved in films does not make one notable. His primary claim to fame is the role his death played in his mother's life and her dealing with it. Notability is NOT derived from familial relationships and the fact that he is mentioned in a documentary on his mother does not make him notable --- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 15:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the Nancy Kwan article, in a new 'Personal life' section, detailing her husbands/son. GiantSnowman 20:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Why relist? If nobody is arguing to keep the article, simply treat it like a PROD.  Delete/redirect as one would normally treat a prod.--- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 01:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's pretty much standard practice to try for two relists before throwing in the towel on a crickets-chirping "discussion". ;) - The Bushranger One ping only 04:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * And I've always thought it was a dumb practice particularly when it is something as benign/non-controversial as this one. If a PROD would do and the result is obvious, it becomes just a beaucratic action to relist.  I could see relisting when there is a legit discussion or where the closing admin looks at it and says, "Hmmm, I don't think this should be deleted without more discussion" but in that case, they should chime into why.  Relisting an article that is going through AFD as a formality is a waste of time and effort.--- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 20:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect - we are not a memorial website. We have almost always merged the relatives of famous persons into the notable person's biography. Bearian (talk) 15:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.