Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhard Seliger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Bernhard Seliger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't find sufficient sources to prove notability. Think WP:NACADEMIC; it doesn't seem like they meet any of the criteria given. toobigtokale (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. toobigtokale (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and South Korea.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I found four reviews of his edited volumes:, , , . But those don't count as much toward WP:AUTHOR and he has multiple co-editors. I didn't find any authored books (or published reviews of such books) that would count, and the citation record doesn't show a pass of WP:PROF for his non-book publications. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.