Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhardt Seifert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Reasons for deletion outweigh the sole reason for retention. –MuZemike 01:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Bernhardt Seifert

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

almost WP:ONEVENT. fails WP:BIO. the article name is incorrect. hardly anything in gnews for his correct name. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. He was a developer that got stonewalled when he intended to develop a corner of property that nobody wanted developed.  He went to court.  This happens pretty frequently.  So why is he notable? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 00:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep apparently his was the test case for the validity of the covenants under Australian law.     DGG ( talk ) 03:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * and how does that meet WP:BIO? LibStar (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed; that seems to meet the article's not eligible for speedy deletion, but doesn't establish any notability. Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No references to meet WP:BIO and the uncited claim that he's best known for being involved in legal actions is troublesome from a BLP view. Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —LibStar (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.