Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernstein Medical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Bernstein Medical

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

AfD created by request from IP editor at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. The rationale given was:

The subject of this article has not itself received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Timothy Joseph Wood 19:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Also nominated at Afd is Robert M. Bernstein. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:SPAM. See also Robert M. Bernstein. Narky Blert (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reads like an advert. Of the 16 references listed, not one actually has any depth of coverage of the clinic. While some mention Bernstein, many don't make any mention of his clinic: 1) a feature on hair loss, clinic gets passing mention 2) a quarterback consults Bernstein, clinic has passing mention 3) dead link 4) passing mention for Bernstein, clnic not actually mentioned by name 5) is a press release 6) Bernstein mentioned, clinic not 7) Bernstein quoted quite a bit, but no mention of the clinic itself 8) interview with Bernstein, briefest mention of the location of his clinic 9) lots of people and their workplaces mentioned, including Bernstein and his clinic 10) No mention of Bernstein or his clinic 11) Bernstein is mentioned, clinic is not 12-16) links are not given but text suggests they aren't providing coverage of the clinic itself. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as clear advertising with only clear company announcements and listings as sources, that's enough to delete as it is. SwisterTwister   talk  18:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * delete and salt obvious promo Jytdog (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant promotion. Lepricavark (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * COMMENT FYI: It appears the nominator has been making COI edits to another dermatologist's (competitor's?) page (Cameron Rokhsar) and several edits/tags/noms to other dermatologist's pages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E016:A700:D4E1:E2A1:3568:3C8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:810A:BF00:D8A4:F18D:7DA9:E7FD (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.