Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Lucas (footballer, born 1921)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Bert Lucas (footballer, born 1921)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This Page Is Lacking Too Much Information And In My Opinion Needs To Be Revised Or Deleted. Evan Daniel Collett 04:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * strong keep: meets notability of WP:NAFL; just because there isn't a lot of information, doesn't mean he lacks notability. Flickerd (talk) 09:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NAFL and as Flickerd said an article being a stub isn't a reason for deletion. Jevansen (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep no valid deletion rationale has been presented by the nom, and I suggest they read the relevant notability guides before making anymore AFDs.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 13:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Meets WP:NAFL and invalid rationale for deletion. Let's close this now. Smartyllama (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Agreed Keep I Made A Mistake, I Should Have Tagged The Article And Stated That It Needs More Information Rather Than Nominating For Deletion Evan Daniel Collett 16:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Close Discussion? Can We Have An Admin Close This Or Is More Discussion Needed? Evan Daniel Collett 16:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you stop edit conflicting with me, sure! ;-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.