Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berta Rosenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 09:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Berta Rosenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Nonnotable supercentenarian without reliable sources. See WT:WOP. More as needed. JJB 23:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep she was the oldest Jewish person, if being the oldest African American is notable enough for an article than surely the Oldest Jew is notable, besides she was the oldest living person born in the country Germany. Longevitydude (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * How would I know that, since the one link in the article is dead? Have you read WP:OTHERSTUFF? Have you read WP:GNG? JJB 16:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with JJB; there are no reliable sources to indicate that this person passes the notablity requirements. This article seems to be nothing more than cruft about how she was the "18th oldest person" and "5th oldest German person". So what? Bcperson89 (talk) 17:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Might I make another suggestion then, how about we merge her to the list of German supercentenarians, or the American ones, the chose is yours, the list of where she was born( Germany), or the list of where she died(America), either list will suffice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Longevitydude (talk • contribs) 19:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. I could find literally nothing about her at Google News. As I have argued above, simply being the oldest person in a given country does not grant automatic notability. The usual Wikipedia guidelines for sourcing must be met, on a case-by-case basis, and they are not met for this person. --MelanieN (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources, non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Neptune 5000  ( talk ) 23:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.