Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertram K. and Nina Fletcher Little


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Bertram K. and Nina Fletcher Little

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has been without any references for over 7 years. It thus violates the principal of verifiability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Did you even bother to do a simple Google search. I can find plenty of sources that can satisfy WP:GNG, NY Times, Baltimore Sun, Boston Globe, SeaCoastonline, The Morning Call, Havard Magazine. There are many other websites and books that are devoted and mention their collections of folk art over a period of 50 sum years. Also is a separate article on the historic museum they owned and still exists called Cogswell's Grant. and other collections are also featured in many other museums like Baltimore Museum of art.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 19:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per sources found by JayJay, I'm lost as to why this was even nominated since Google Searches is full of books, news & whatnot, It's clear the nom never bothered searching for anything sadly. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment If people want to keep this article, they should at a minimum actually add the sources to the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅  Jay  Jay What did I do? 19:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have any other issues with this article, remember AfD is not for cleanup. I am expanding the article currently and sources have been added.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 03:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Thanks to JayJay's efforts. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per blatant lack of WP:BEFORE. AfD is not cleanup. --Cavarrone 06:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.