Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berwin Leighton Paisner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Sr13 03:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Berwin Leighton Paisner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No objective assertion of notability, some promotional language -- Vsion 03:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if cleaned up. Google and Google News score plenty of significant hits, and the firm represents some major companies like Tesco and Rolls Royce, so I have little doubt about notability. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but should be sourced and wikified. Lankiveil 05:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep and clean up. Per comments above. &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 22:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Must be suitably referenced to prove notability, and rewritten to remove the peacock terms and autiobio slant. Blue chip clients are not enough on their own. Adrian   M. H.  23:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, reference, cleanup, and all of that good stuff, and the article should be just fine. The article has notability since it is an international law firm, and the single reference proves it.  *Cremepuff 222*  23:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.