Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beshingamist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Beshingamist

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Declined PROD, with reason "Neologism; WP:MADEUP". The author should consider entering their neologisms into the more liberal Urban Dictionary rather than staid old Wikipedia. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as soon as possible - Non-notable, non-sensical neologism that I had never heard of before until reading this Wiki article. Like the Nom said, this is more appropriate for Urban Dictonary, not Wikipedia. --Madison-chan (talk) 01:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete. SPA not only proposes brand-new neologism of no notability whatsoever, but trumpets it as such within the article. Fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleted as a hoax. Close please. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.