Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BestPrice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

BestPrice

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Advertising. Spam article about a spam website. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of third-party sources; all sources are either from the company or its parent company Phaistos Networks. --McGeddon (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * BestPrice.gr is NOT a spam site and this article is by no means a spam one. If so, please elaborate. Thank you. Phaistonian (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Phaistonian (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC) I fail to see "100% promotional". Sorry.
 * Delete 100% promotional with only related links. Author looks to have a Conflict of Interest. Night of the Big Wind  talk  17:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If it is your employer, that is understandable. But it won't save the article. And we don't have to convince you that it is promotional, but you have to convince us that it is not promotional. Up until now, you fail on that. Night of the Big Wind  talk  21:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Phaistonian (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC) Yes, I am a related to the company (co-founder). If that makes the article promotional, so be it. All that's written are facts. If you are not familiar with the Greek market/internet and that way you call this promotional, again, so be it.

Phaistonian (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC) It's not notable because it's Greek. In Greece it's far more than notable. Phaistonian (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Can you please point me to what source they are pointing at? Some of those articles don't even point to the company's site.
 * Delete. Non-notable shopping website with no independent sources. The name has been used to refer to many different things.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability put forth even after the creator's complaining. SL93 (talk) 00:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG and is clearly WP:SPAM. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above, does not meet WP:CORP. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are many Greek companies on Wikipedia, see Category:Companies_of_Greece. But they have sources that show they are notable. But this one doesn't. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 19:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you really not understand that Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising? Night of the Big Wind  talk  18:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" Upton Sinclair. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Why isn't this a speedy delete? Wee Curry Monster talk 21:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess because we are nice lads and lasses and are willing to give mr. Phaistonian a steep learning curve. Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK thanks it looked a clear G11 candidate to me. Oh well. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Snow.  Per the above string of rationales.  Let's stop wasting time.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.