Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Albums of the Noughties (2000–2010)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 15:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Best Albums of the Noughties (2000–2010)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A list generated from compiling subjective lists of top albums from the last decade from various publicatons and websites. The scoring method is complete OR by giving the same amount of points to ranked albums regardless of they were ranking "alt/indie" albums or all albums. The same amount of points given to consensus pick of critics at Billboard as well as each of 48 executives that Music Week polled. A definitive list like this just can be done. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete blatant OR. Who says "noughties" anyways? OSbornarfcontribs. 23:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a Britishism to me. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 02:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subjective.  The sources listed do nothing to change the fact that someone just made this up.  Idk224 (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Shame, because a lot of work has gone into it, but as it's completely made up of original research and synthesis it doesn't have a place in Wikipedia. It'd be nice if there was somewhere online that liked this kind of thing, but am not sure where that would be. 'Noughties' is used a lot here in the UK by the way. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.