Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Laid Plans (David Torn album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  → Call me  Hahc  21  05:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Best Laid Plans (David Torn album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN album. Fails GNG. GSearch for refs returns only promotional/sales/minor blogs. Current refs consist of only the label and allmusic.com. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  01:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * This is an album from 1984 - wp:NTEMP. I believe Allmusic qualifies for one review - and it was released under the ECM label.  That it has a review online twenty years later to me is enough to indicate that there has been enough coverage out there to pass the GNG.  I'm going to say Soft Keep - hard keep if anyone can turn up a reference. Neonchameleon (talk) 01:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to David Torn. This is a notable album - GBooks has several items of coverage but only snippet views. This would have received print reviews back in the 1980s so on the one hand it satisfies notability guidelines, but on the other, we don't really have enough for a standalone article until someone is able to access those reviews, so perhaps a minimal merge and redirect to the artist would be appropriate for now. --Michig (talk) 09:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.