Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Best Practice &amp; Research: Clinical Rheumatology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this one-line article sourced only to its subject makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This appears to be a legitimate peer-reviewed medical journal that is listed in the PubMed database. The stub was just created a day or two ago, I recommend giving it some time to flesh out. --Elonka 21:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Listed at WikiProject Academic Journals/Deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Elonka. II  | (t - c) 01:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as my comments on the other journals in this group of ill-advised deletion nominations. DGG (talk) 02:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Elonka. Edward321 (talk) 04:33, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per DGG. Support closing these AfDs promptly.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as previously mentioned about the 10 other journals that were listed for AfD, STRONG SUPPORT closing all these afd's Medicellis (talk) 16:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.