Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Rap Performance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Grammy Award for Best Rap Performance. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Best Rap Performance

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article already exists: Grammy Award for Best Rap Performance Another Believer  ( Talk ) 14:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

True, although this was a different Grammy Awards category than the newly created (to be awarded from 2012). I will combine both Wikipedia entries. Zighlveit (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not a different category if the name is the same... If award criteria have changed, this can be noted on the existing article. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps AFD is not necessary if the article remains a re-direct? I will let others decide if deletion or re-direct is more appropriate. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added the information on the revived category to the original Wikipedia entry and merged my own entry with the existing one. That'll do, I guess. Zighlveit (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Redirect is fine-after the AFD. "Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed." It does not even save redirectors time to do it now rather than waiting; redirecting takes as long as it takes. Besides, the redirect and the removal of the tag can be done in one edit. However, it does take other editors extra time to look through the edit history to find the text. There is no good reason to ignore the rules that I can see, and at least two good reasons to follow them; even WP:IAR is inapplicable here, because the redirecting action is not an improvement. Anarchangel (talk) 23:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Nominator seems to agree that redirection is appropriate, and I concur. Rlendog (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect looks like a good soulution here. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.