Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Rate Referrals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Best Rate Referrals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After several source searches, the depth of coverage does not appear to be enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Available sources are mostly press releases. North America1000 11:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: The company seems to be very aggressive in marketing, and in promotion. The copy in the article is promotional in more than tone as well, and it gives only reasons why the people are exciting, dynamic, wealthy, attractive, etc., and not reasons why the company is spoken-of as a company. The nearest would be the roundups of business practices, and those seem to be based solely on growth. So, yeah, just fails the notability. Hithladaeus (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as there doesn't seem to be solid and good coverage with searches only finding this,this and this (one press release). SwisterTwister   talk  21:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 07:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.