Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Video Game Ever

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 15:24, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Best Video Game Ever
Fork of NiGHTS Into Dreams. --BM 14:00, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete -- NPOV problematic title. Content exists elsewhere. Longhair 14:24, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - article forks are bad, name is awful, redirect would be useless. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 19:42, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The title "Best Video Game Ever" will always lead to a POV article. Zzyzx11 19:53, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant article, title is inherently POV.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV. vlad_mv 04:51, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a good article about NiGHTS Into Dreams on its own right, but calling it (or any game, for that matter) the "Best Video Game Ever" is a blatant violation of NPOV. 193.167.132.66 07:32, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Right. I'm not even dure what I was THINKING when I did that. It's gone. — unsigned vote by User:69.141.8.245 (contribs); same IP as page author
 * Delete. At one point I put up a question in vfd's discussion as to why people are so willing to delete rather than redirect duplicates. This is not an example of what I had in mind. What I had in mind were titles which may be useful redirects. This title is not useful and can safely be deleted. I have a hunch that this article may be an experiment. 129.177.61.123 10:12, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)