Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Youth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, the concerns by the nominator were addressed during the discussion. Cavarrone 11:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Best Youth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My PROD boldly removed despite that I specifically specificed my concerns, and the fact the band has only released 1 full album 5 years ago and an EP now, the user simply removed it with the basis of there still being sources, but the exact sources listed here are not acceptable, see my PROD explanations. My search at Portugal's largest newspaper online also has found nothing. SwisterTwister  talk  02:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The actual PROD comment was : Listed sources are still in fact questionable as substanc and notability since they are not the outstanding coverage needed, my News and browsers searches are only finding few links some of which then only include reviews from indie websites, not something that would exactly be convincing. The Portuguese Wiki actually contains no sources at all, so that's a concern if no one has even cared to at least fix the native Wiki. This was deleted nearly 4 years ago as speedy A7. Comte0 (talk) 23:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Research multiple Portugal's largest newspapers online:
 * 1) Expresso
 * 2) Diario de Notícias
 * 3) Jornal de Notícias
 * 4) RTP Notícias
 * 5) Diário Digital
 * 6) Público

Some were added to the article. I just do not wish to filling this entry with so many sources. Önni (talk) 03:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC) I also found a review in Les Inrocks :
 * Expresso's article is good.
 * Diario de noticias actualy talk about the NOS D"Bandada fest, I don't think it is relevant.
 * Jornal de noticias does talk about the band.
 * RTP (portuguese public tv) does talk about the band.
 * Diário Digital doesn't look like a reliable source, and pt:Diário Digital does not exist (it was deleted for lack of reliable sources).
 * Público article looks good to me.

In a nutshell : a few of the sources are solid and make the article notable. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 21:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * comment. I concurr with User:Comte0's assessment of the sources. In short: "Expresso (newspaper)" and "Público (Portugal)" are similar, dated from and about the album release. "Jornal de Noticias" and "RTP" are about participation in two festivals (Paredes de Coura, a major one over here, and another not so notorious). All four articles are about the band. The sources cover most of the main portuguese newspappers. A quick search shows at a least a listing at this year's Paredes de Coura festival, also at Correio da Manhã, so it covers all major newspapers. Except for Jornal de Noticias, the link has no connection that I can see with the band. Diário Digital sure is not the best of sources and anyway it adds nothing to the other (listing of Paredes de Coura bands). Does it make it notable? I guess it is marginal, they have participated in some of the major music festivals (but as a hot national prospect, not a 'main' band) and they do have one album released. - Nabla (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.