Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best available science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Best available science

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTESSAY Adam9007 (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. This is pure, non-encyclopedic original research. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints&#124;Mistakes) 22:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR apply here. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 22:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete in agreement with the above arguments per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR. Would Wikiversity be a possibility? Sam Sailor Talk! 09:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 09:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - useful phrase, used in legal cases dealing with scientific evidence. I'm not sure how it can be fixed.... Bearian (talk) 18:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best and restart if needed, the current contents are still overall questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.