Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best of Bliss Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 22:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Best of Bliss Team

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable mixtape, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep That's why it's called a STUB. Maybe you should go find out what a stub is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoesquashfan5000 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Struck out since that's the most invalid deletion rationale I've heard. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What's the point of striking comments at an AfD? It's not a vote, and unless it's a sock or similar, I fail to see the meaning. The closing admin can and will weight everything in the closing procedure, no need for striking comments, especially given you're the nominator. I took the liberty to unstrike it, hope you don't mind. This is by no mean expression an opinion on the matter.  Snowolf  How can I help? 13:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article fails the notability criteria of WP:NALBUMS, since no significant coverage in independent reliable sources is demonstrated. —C.Fred (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I don't think the article should have been created with as little information as it has, but I think the creator of it deserves a chance to work on it. I think a deadline should be given and, if in that time, the article is not sufficiently improved, it be deleted.  Nowyouseeme talk2me  13:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable compilation album which fails notability criteria at WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. I would have suggested a merge into the band article, but there isn't anything worth merging. --JD554 (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable album. Fails WP:SONGS. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. This article fails Notability (music) and Verifiability. Cunard (talk) 01:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.