Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best of Both Worlds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  


 * Best of Both Worlds - Is this legitimate? Regardless, it doesn't make any sense. Perl 21:52, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a Star Trek: Next Generation episode.  There is precedent for the eps having their own page.  See Encounter at Farpoint.  Admittedly, it needs work, though. RadicalBender 22:02, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll add some to it when I have time... in an attempt to make it a better article. Perhaps best put on cleanup, instead of here. Lyellin 22:47, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * I would suggest moving episodes of any given TV show to an article that reflects the show in the title of the article... ex "Star Trek TNG: Best of Both Worlds" A lot of TV show episodes are rather common phrases that could merit their own articles, it's important to keep fact separate from fiction.  Alexwcovington 01:30, Feb 21, 2004 (CST)
 * Delete: insignficant. Random episodes of TV shows get their own pages? So what if it's been done before; no need to repeat the mistake. Wile E. Heresiarch 09:41, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Probably the most significant and popular ST:TNG episode. Mrwojo 21:00, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It was voted the most popular TNG episode. Jacob1207 21:25, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's a particularly notable episode, but I agree with Alexwcovington that the title is bad. A common enough phrase that doesn't mention Star Trek at all will not do.  Move content and turn into redirect?  Cool Hand Luke 21:44, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. BL 10:32, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Resistance is futile. -- Seth Ilys 16:43, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I think this page should be kept, but I agree that naming should be consistent for all articles on television series episodes. This is an actual saying and the naming of this article could lead to confusion. -- Graham :) 19:05, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * The actual saying is best of both worlds, not Best of Both Worlds. Keep at existing location. Morwen 19:06, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Even though the capitalisation on the saying is different, I would still advocate moving the article. What happens when the title of a Star Trek episode is the same as another article on wikipedia? I kinda feel that wherever one would move that article to should be where the standard is set before all these articles get written. Naming conventions exist to stop confusion from happening in the first place -- Graham :) 20:33, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to a more relevant name, as Alexwcovington suggested. --Johnleemk 14:52, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I think the way it is currently (@ 'Best of Both Worlds' with a clear note at the top linking to the phrase) is just fine. --Mrwojo 16:43, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

It should be The Best of Both Worlds anyway. Montrealais
 * Huh. And now I see that already has its own page. I'll be merging them now. - Montrealais


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.