Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best of Dragon Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Best of Dragon Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable anthology volumes (don't remember if I had any articles in them, but that was about the time I was most active as a TSR writer). Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I just started this one, and I guess I'd have liked more time to work on it. But, I'll recommend a redirect to Dragon (magazine) instead if that's not workable. BOZ (talk) 11:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete the magazine is notable, these special issues really aren't. Their existance is already mentioned in the magazine article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dragon (magazine). -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 22:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.