Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best pony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also because many people say there is nothing mergeable, if people wonder why I didn't go for a redirect or a merger. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Best pony

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:GNG. Information and sources cane easily be wp:merged into My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic or similar pages. Comatmebro (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. As much as I love My little Pony, this should be merged into the MLP page. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. It doesn't have enough content to justify having a separate page for this. Alexius08 (talk) 23:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect not independently notable Atlantic306 (talk) 01:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- this is not wikia. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia  ᐐT₳LKᐬ  03:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NEO. Also seems to be an extrapolation of "Best girl" which doesn't have its own page despite being an arguably more popular saying.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect given above commentary. I am not certain about the value of a merge, but I am not opposed to that if a consensus is reached in that direction. Aoba47 (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with the appropriate My Little Pony article--maybe the fandom one. White Arabian Filly  Neigh 21:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As much as that might seem to make sense, there is zero material in the article that is notable and would merit a merge. It would simply be adding unencyclopedic material to the article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.