Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bestune T55


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  14:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Bestune T55

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This truck apparently exists but is otherwise unremarkable. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. This is one of a series of questionably sourced articles about Chinese automobiles created by the same editor. Mo Billings (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Mo Billings (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * How does it not meet notability? The truck does exist, and many sources say so. If you read all of the sources I have listed, you will find that they support eachother. DestinationFearFan (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.      </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bestune T55 to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC) </li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs:

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The best I can do (as someone who cannot read the language) to evaluate the sources provided above, on the page, and from searching the name of the vehicle is to machine translate them, skim them, and check that the source is a reliable enough source on this topic and that the article does not appear to be paid coverage of some form. To me it looks like there are multiple sources passing all those conditions, those sources just happen to not be in English. That constitutes a pass of WP:GNG. I would change my mind if someone with relevant language ability can explain that the coverage is somehow not independent, but on my own I can find no reason to think that. - Astrophobe  (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.