Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Colony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Beta Colony

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional locaiton, seems to fail WP:NFICTION. Like a lot of other elements from this fictional universe... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Provisional delete. As it stands, this article is a gross breach of WP:IN-UNIVERSE and WP:NOTPLOT.  However, I did find A Breath of Fresh Eyre: Intertextual and Intermedial Reworkings of Jane Eyre which has an in-depth out-of-universe discussion of the social culture of Beta Colony in comparison to the social difficulties of Jane Eyre covering half a dozen pages.  I think it would be WP:UNDUE to base an article entirely on one writer—we don't know if this is an outlier crazy idea or generally in line with feminist thinking.  But I also found Lois McMaster Bujold: Essays on a Modern Master of Science Fiction and Fantasy which has some brief out-of-universe talk about Beta Colony (see note 6 of Regina Yung Lee's article).  I'm willing to withdraw my delete if there is someone willing to run with this and turn it into an encyclopaedic article. SpinningSpark 12:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Interesting finds, but I can't get sufficient view of the books to confirm there's in-depth coverage of the location/society (if I could I'be happy to withdraw this nom). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * What gbooks will serve is often context related. Try doing your own gbooks search with the search term  rather than following the direct link.  Both the results I linked should come up on the first page. SpinningSpark 08:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - nice finds by Spinningspark. However I don't believe the brief mention in note #6 on page 48 of the Essays reference is in-depth enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.