Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Rho chapter of Alpha Phi Omega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Beta Rho chapter of Alpha Phi Omega
Non-notable local chapter of national organization. tregoweth 01:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Fellow brothers they are trying to delete our chapter Wiki entries under the belief that they are non-notable. if you wish to also join in on the good fight please come post in the Alpha Epsilon Zeta Chapter of Alpha Phi Omega entry. i am trying my best to defend our ideals by defending our chapter wiki's, i am doing this in hopes that it will help defend our organization's ideals and principles and spread our message of friendship, leadership, and service. by no means Tregoweth take this as something hostile, i am a firm believer in talking things out and dealing with things in a calm manner. i am doing this in the hopes to pursuade you in letting our chapter wiki's stay. besides i know just from hitting the random article link that there are better fish to fry out there. thanks for your time.Butterbean04 02:39, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. National fraternities are notable; local chapters are not.--Isotope23 02:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, yea verily, O my brothers! As per Isotope23, it's hard to see how local frat chapters have any kind of established notability. Eddie.willers 03:14, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. I wholeheartedly support the existence of an article about the national Alpha Phi Omega but not articles about the individual chapters. Student organizations that exist at only a single school (i.e. fraternity chapters) are generally non-notable. --Metropolitan90 04:00, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * May I ask on what basis are articles about these chapters being deleted ? To which fraternity do the delete voters belong ?  Is the nomination (are the nominations) being made from an NPOV ? --SockpuppetSamuelson 12:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could someone explain what fraternity membership (or not) has to do with cruft?  RGTraynor 11:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete with prejudice. Non-notable fratcruft. Paul 16:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. These individual chapters are obviously unique enough to warrant articles separate from Alpha Phi Omega.   Un  focused  17:39, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As usual, no deletion required. Trollderella 17:52, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|24px]] 19:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Isotope23. And for the record, I was never a member of any fraternity. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 20:35, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all of these chapters. Andrew Levine 23:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all the chapters.  Starry Eyes  23:41, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As usual, no fratcruft required. Wikipedia is not a free_host or webspace provider, and that's what's here. --Calton | Talk 01:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Individual chapters of organizations are not notable. RasputinAXP   talk  *  contribs  15:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.