Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Upsilon Chi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Beta Upsilon Chi
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is (still) nothing in this article to suggest that this fraternity is any more notable than the tens of thousands of others in the USA. Most of the opinions at the previous AFD amounted to WP:WAX-type arguments. Stifle (talk) 14:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the same good reasons for keeping it apply. 24 chapters in several states is enough. I generally say to delete if its single college or just a little more, but regional significance like this is sufficient. There is additionally general interest because of the court case about recognition, which they won. DGG (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasons in previous nomination. The fraternity in question has not suddenly become less notable. tyler willis    |  talk   to me  00:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.