Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betadot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. RasputinAXP  c  20:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Betadot
Non-notable website; Alexa rank of 248,080. Delete. Ral315 (talk) 03:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Frankchn 11:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep pending verification of information The notability requirement is not official Wikipedia policy. It is, rather, a suggested, unofficial policy that does not yet have consensus, and therefore not necessarilly by itself a reason for deletion.  Moreover, it is unclear as to what the definition of notable would be for this site.  It does seem to offer the same services as other sites that are listed in articles in Wikipedia, and unless there is some evidence that it is a bogus site it may very well have enough interest to qualify as "notable".
 * That being said, parts of the article is not currently independently verifiable. Therefore it will require additional citation to meet the verifiability standard.  Once that is corrected, the article would not violate official policy, far as I can tell. Dugwiki 15:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, without independent references, I'm for the article being deleted. Dugwiki 15:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not very notable. delete per WP:NOT, WP:WEB and WP:VANITY Aeon 18:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The entry has to establish WP:V (a policy) and this one doesn't. ~ trialsanderrors 00:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.