Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  00:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NBIOL and WP:GNG. No source besides one paper. Hongsy (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Hongsy (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Draftify or Delete. Published in 2017, it is possible this has been mentioned in other manuscripts under a different name, which might be identifiable via sequence searches or deep review of articles citing the paper supporting this stub.  However, I believe that until a motif such as this has been confirmed in some way through experimental evidence, we shouldn't have an article about it.  I looked and we do not have an appropriate list to add a mention to.  Therefore, my !vote to either Delete or Draftify. (same comment as that on a similar AfD)
 * User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * keep: see my comment at [] (w.r.t. the deletion discussion for IMPDH RNA motif ). Zashaw (talk) 09:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.